FREE PORN VIDEO'S

by **admin_pornrev** » Sun Nov 09, 2014 10:13 am

Angelina Jolie backlash grows as everyday moms blast elitist double mastectomy as affordable only by ultra rich

FROM: http://www.naturalnews.com/040417_Angel ... _moms.html

Found thanks to Carl Watts ‏ or @Poet_Carl_Watts on Twitter

Monday, May 20, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com (See all articles...)

Tags: Moms, Angelina Jolie, News

(NaturalNews) Angelina Jolie's bizarre announcement that she had both of her healthy breasts surgically removed to "prevent" cancer has turned into a PR nightmare. Not only has Natural News revealed the hidden agenda of corporations patenting and owning human genetic code so they can reap trillions in profits from genetic slavery, now a New Jersey kindergarten teacher is blasting Angelina Jolie for promoting an elitist procedure only affordable to the ultra-wealthy.

"That's good for her; she's got the best health care and she's got money. She doesn't have to worry about taking off of work. She doesn't have to worry about taking care of her family, cooking or cleaning -- the things that the normal woman would have to do," said Debbie Gentile-Abbood in a NY Post article.

Gentile-Abbood went on to explain that normal working moms don't have the huge wealth that Jolie will obviously use to undergo top-notch reconstructive and cosmetic surgery. Nor do everyday working moms have the ability to just take off a couple of months from work to undergo the procedures. While Jolie can spend millions of dollars to get her breasts worked on and re-shaped to be fit for the big screen, everyday working moms don't have millions of dollars lying around to spend on their breasts.

She also tears into Angelina Jolie's fear mongering campaign that has already frightened countless women into thinking their own breasts might kill them. "What am I supposed to do? Sit around every day and worry that I'm going to get cancer?"
Angelina Jolie's elitist attitude offending women everywhere
Look at the Facebook comments on some of the recent articles Natural News has posted about Angelina Jolie and you'll find a common thread: Women are deeply offended by the idea that they should cut off their perfectly healthy breasts as some sort of bizarre medical self-mutilation ritual to "prevent" a disease they don't even have.

For starters, the mutilation of women by cutting out their breasts strikes hard at the female identity. Breasts help give nourishment to newborn babies, and they carry lymph nodes that are an integral part of the immune system. Surgically removing breasts leaves scar tissue, numbness and pain. While this might arguably be acceptable if aggressive cancer is diagnosed to already exist in the breast tissue (although even then, there are better options that don't harm the patient), it seems bizarre and even insane to remove healthy breasts that have no sign of disease.

If Jolie's P.R. stunt -- simultaneously synchronized with People Magazine and TIME Magazine -- was designed to try to convince everyday women that they all need to have their genes tested and their breasts removed, then it has failed miserably. If anything, it has raised more questions about the true motivations of the for-profit cancer industry and the way in which corporations claim monopoly ownership over human genes (BRCA1 and BRCA2). It has also called into question Jolie's state of mind.

As Natural News has already reported, private corporations and universities already claim ownership over 20% of women's genes, and that number will continue to increase if the practice is not halted by the U.S. Supreme Court. A key decision is expected in June.

Natural News has publicly challenged Angelina Jolie to denounce corporate patents on human genes, but she has so far refused to do so. Jolie's publicity of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes has already begun motivating men to have their prostate glands surgically removed even though they have no prostate cancer.

• Ann Lambert • Top Commenter • PCC Cascade
Euthanasia is the only sure way to never get any kind of cancer, but I only recommend it to complete idiots.
Reply • 15 • Like • Follow Post • 16 hours ago
o
Sergio Crocco • County College of Morris
Thats a good recommendation for corporate scumbags!
Reply • Like • 6 hours ago
•
Jacinta Cox • Dallas High School
There are a lot of reasons why she shouldn't have done it....not doing it because not everyone can afford to is not one of those reasons...that is a stupid and selfish argument. If doing it was an otherwise effective and beneficial move for her health others should not expect her to not do it because they are jealous they can not afford it. It was not a good move for her health, but that is another issue entirely.
Reply • 12 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 5:33am
o
Ann Lambert • Top Commenter • PCC Cascade
I think the point was more accurately that only rich women can afford the expensive reconstruction after the mutilation. Ms. Jolie, with all her money, will be redone to still look normal, while everyone else will just look---well, mutilated. It is only one portion of Jolie's argument that is a total red herring, and I think that is what the woman was trying to articulate.
Reply • 4 • Like • 16 hours ago
o
Ann Lambert • Top Commenter • PCC Cascade
Euthanasia is the only sure way to never get any kind of cancer, but I only recommend it to complete idiots.
Reply • 30 • Like • 16 hours ago
o
Sandi Peterson • Top Commenter
No, there are multiple ways to kill cancer cells without euthanasia. Everyone has cancer cells develop almost on a daily basis, but the body kills them, if the immune system is strong enough to do so.
Reply • 2 • Like • 14 hours ago
View 1 more
•
Colleen S Moore
the more men that have their prostate removed because of their fear of cancer the better. eliminate them from the gene pool as quickly as possible, who needs to pass on that kind of thinking.
Reply • 10 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 4:48am
o
Jacinta Cox • Dallas High School
I would like to disagree with that logic...but I can't LOL!
Reply • 3 • Like • Yesterday at 5:34am
o
Dawn Gifford • Top Commenter • University of Maryland, College Park
Um, removing the prostate does not take away the ability to conceive.
Reply • 6 • Like • Yesterday at 6:02am
o
Ben Wood • Top Commenter
You are an idiot. Removing the prostate doesn't cause infertility.
Reply • 2 • Like • Yesterday at 7:15am
View 2 more
•
Julie Boyce
IS Debbie Gentile-Abbood a moron? Would other women really copy this drastic and mentally disturbed move? Cancer finds many ways to manifest so cutting up one's body is no guarrantee of avoiding it....Angelina is just as likely to die from lack of nutrient....I question her motives when I see recent mal-nourished shots of her...maybe she just wanted some different ones...lol.
Reply • 9 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 9:14am
o
Coco Bean • Top Commenter • Trinity School of Natural Health
Julie: Thanks for confirming my thoughts. Yes, Debbie Gentile-Abbood is certainly a moron and a jealous individual. Of all the things this woman could complain about like . . . lack of funds for her kindergartners, she's jealous that "regular" women not having enough cash or insurance to do what this woman did. If Jolie cuts her stomach to prevent obesity which leads to diabetes will this lady want the same insurance to do the same? Insane.
Reply • Like • 13 hours ago
o
Tatiacha Bhodsvatan • Follow • Top Commenter
I really don't think she is jealous, just terrified and feeling powerless because she believes the lies being taught her.

I think her point about money and time is another aspect of the whole story though. IF this was a responsible coarse of action for those with the gene mutation (which of course any normal person knows it is not) it would not be something that 99% of the women with the mutation could do if they wanted to, based not just on price, but on the inability to take time off work. So why would the rich woman run out and tell all those women to do something they could never do, and by doing so increase their stress and fear. She could have just done what she chose and kept her mouth shut about it.

Of course that wouldn't sell all these gene tests at 3000 to 4000 a pop. I am sure her bringing "attention" to this is a way for the testers to try and pressure insurance to cover these crazy tests and maybe to eventually cover the insane surgery just in time for Obamacare. It is easy to imagine a few years down the road women being required to be tested, and being required to remove their breasts if they have the mutation, and not being offered the reconstruction of their breasts unless they pay out of pocket for that part.

All that being said, so many woman supporting Angelina's position in comments and posts who would do the same to themselves, is the scariest thing of all...
Reply • Like • 7 hours ago
•
Christine Hoeflich • San Jose State University
There are much more effective ways to cut your risk of cancer by 90% and more, and they don't involve cutting body parts. Proper nutrition, avoiding processed foods, getting Vitamin D, cutting out sugar, staying away from certain drugs, proper exercise, and more. Each one of those factors cuts your risk by roughly 50%, so that if you do several, your risk is lowered by 90% or more. Why are people so stupid? Well, I think Angelina might be stupid, or else mind-controlled, and the cancer industry is having a ball right now.
Reply • 8 • Like • Follow Post • 20 hours ago
o
Halina Król • Politechnika Warszawska
Christine, I agree with You in 100 %. I think, that our fears kill us more, than cancer.
Reply • 2 • Like • 7 hours ago
o
Tanya Tkach • Follow • SUNY Plattsburgh
Christine, I also agree with you plus there are alternative medicines that help to rid the body of cancer. Cancer is a wake up call to those who diagnosed with it. They have to change - thoughts, behaviors, attitudes and lifestyles. I do not agree with what Jolie did, but I am not walking in her shoes.
Reply • 1 • Like • 6 hours ago
•
Sherri Laughlin Ashley • Top Commenter • Jefferson State Community College
I do not like this backlash from every day women about Jolie. I think it's ridiculous. She was just trying to inform other women just like Congress Woman Debbie Washerman Shultz did when she had the same procedure. My goodness, it's like a post I shared other day: No matter what you do Whether it's something good or bad, people will get mad at you. My insurance doesn't cover the gene test but does cover the procedure & reconstructive surgery, I realize how fortunate I am for this as many are not.
Reply • 7 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 5:48am
o
Dan Casio • Follow • Top Commenter
hahaha debbie waserman.. another liberal IDIOT
Reply • 3 • Like • Yesterday at 10:48am
o
Stuart Skater Parnell • Top Commenter
Well Devil played!
Reply • 1 • Like • 23 hours ago
o
Doc Red • Follow • Top Commenter • Consultant / Practitioner at Advanced Integrative Medicine, Cebu City ,Phil
Suggest to remove the whole Reproductive System because removing the breast alone won't spare Angelina from Cancer of the reproductive System. Additionally, the secondary sex characteristics partially regulated by the reproductive system. Her surgery does not solve the problem, much better binding that problematic oxidized estrogen with natural remedies and save her boobs.
Reply • 6 • Like • 22 hours ago
View 1 more
•
Marc Authier • Top Commenter
Angela is a hyponcondriac. She needs to go get her sick head fixed up.
Reply • 6 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 6:42am
•
Chiara Vegana • Senior Training Division Coordinator at Cassava Enterprises
She can do what she wants, just don't come sell it to all others like it's the solution of the century!!
Reply • 5 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 7:26am
•
Daniel Houchin Jr • Henry - Senachwine High School
So basicly what these morons who blast Angie for what she did are saying is that even though she is high risk she shouldn't have had the surgery because not everyone has the resources to have it done, yeah that makes sense.......NOT. Now, someone made a comment that Angie went public with it and using her influence; that is the most ridiculous thing I have ever heard and obviousy many people have no clue about what one must do as a celebrity. Did it not occur to anyone, that Angie may have went public with this because the tabloid backlash would be much worse? Everything they do is in the spotlight so I imagine she made it public for it to be said and done though she probably had no idea that it would be the public drawing their own conclusions and judging her and not nosey reporters, paparazzis, etc. Bottom line, anyone with common sense ( which apparently they are in short supply these days) can see she did this to improve her quality of life, while we are on the subject of life, maybe you all should get one.
Reply • 4 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 10:31am
•
Shawn Tuthill • Top Commenter • San Francisco Art Institute
Its that using rich people to promote what everyday normal people should do is wrong, That we should all strive to be like the elite is wrong, and our over-priced and corrupt health care system is wrong. Unnecessary mutilation and drug pushing for profit with no desire to treat the problem only cover the symptoms. And that's why I think this kind of attention is important. People believe that vaccinations and pills are actually good things because they believe what theyre told. The USDA and FDA are just examples of lying to and killing people to make a profit yet people believe their lies. Its a sad state of affairs.
Reply • 4 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 7:52am
•
Erin Moyer Geraci
Neither this article for the opinions of Debbie Gentile-Abbood speak for my opinion. Firstly, Angelina Jolie's opinions and finances do not affect my life. I can confidently say that I have spent absolutely no time thinking about her breasts and what she chooses to do with them. Secondly, I am a married work from home professional with no children. I do not feel abnormal or inadequate, and I don't feel a need to apologize for the way I choose to live.
Reply • 4 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 6:17am
•
Christine Powers • Follow • Top Commenter
her body, her choice. I bet everyone would be praising her name and calling her a hero if she used her liberal rights to have an abortion. Isn't that ALSO cutting into the body? Hypocrites
Reply • 4 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 5:09am
o
Christine Powers • Follow • Top Commenter
her body, her choice. I bet everyone would be praising her name and calling her a hero if she used her liberal rights to have an abortion. Isn't that ALSO cutting into the body? Hypocrites
Reply • 8 • Like • Yesterday at 5:09am
o
Amy Manix
They are hypocrites! Her mother died of (I believe) ovarian cancer and she was tested and showed that she had a high % to get breast cancer. She was quoted as saying that she did it so that she could be around for her children. I HATE liberals >:-(
Reply • 1 • Like • Yesterday at 5:13am
o
Christine Powers • Follow • Top Commenter
87% risk. Its not just about the liberals either though. I do think its hilarious that people are saying THE BODY ISN'T MEANT TO BE CUT INTO. Really? do u have a tattoo
Reply • Like • Yesterday at 5:16am
View 13 more
•
Doc Red • Follow • Top Commenter • Consultant / Practitioner at Advanced Integrative Medicine, Cebu City ,Phil
Suggest to remove the whole Reproductive System because removing the breast alone won't spare Angelina from Cancer of the reproductive System. Additionally, the secondary sex characteristics partially regulated by the reproductive system. Her surgery does not solve the problem, much better binding that problematic oxidized estrogen with natural remedies and save her boobs.
Reply • 3 • Like • Follow Post • 22 hours ago
•
Russ Sherwood • Top Commenter • Olathe North High School
Have always wondered how anyone could look at A.J. and not realize, "That is a face of evil incarnate." Of course they look a Reid, Polosi, Clinton, any Bush or any of these obviously evil people and not see the evil therein. How is it these people are so blind? Can this be treated?
Reply • 3 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 7:59am
•
Patsy Hopper Hall
Why are people deeply offended because Angelina Jolie had this surgery? She made a choice I would not make, but that is her right. Why does being rich even enter into this? I guess I am missing something.
Reply • 2 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 5:28am
o
Julie Boyce
IS Debbie Gentile-Abbood a moron? Would other women really copy this drastic and mentally disturbed move? Cancer finds many ways to manifest so cutting up one's body is no guarrantee of avoiding it....Angelina is just as likely to die from lack of nutrient....I question her motives when I see recent mal-nourished shots of her...maybe she just wanted some different ones...lol.
Reply • 18 • Like • Yesterday at 9:14am
o
Julie Boyce
I was shocked at the degree of self-mutilation....
Reply • 1 • Like • Yesterday at 9:21am
o
Tabitha Trevino
i guess its the monetary-motive that this woman is suggesting. And the influence they presume she has. either way its a personal-view.
Reply • 1 • Like • Yesterday at 9:25am
View 2 more
•
Judy Nay
Oh get over it so she can if it would have stoped half the pain and hurt my breast cancer has coused I would have done it don't juge her nobody has it all easy not even people with money any one who thinks they do is not in the real world everyone has dead lines . The hurt is still hurt if you have money or not so mYbee we should all grow up a little . My hats off to her you do your best girl
Reply • 2 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 9:39am
•
Alli RevolutionaryCaveat • Top Commenter • Webmaster at Tongue and Cheek Inc.
Don't worry low income families! Obamacare will so include FREE double Mastectomies!
Reply • 1 • Like • Follow Post • 12 hours ago
•
Ibrahim Djama Sahal
this Angelina Jolie is not really what she appears to be.
Reply • 1 • Like • Follow Post • 17 hours ago
o
Dee Hayes
well if this world would start leaning towards Christ and believe His Word that we are healed by His stripes, then there would be no cancer, no pharmaceutical companies, no hospitals and no sickness. I believe and i'm healed of migraines, sinus problems, asthma, depression, lust, drinking, drugs, just to name a few. God is the healer. not man and God is in control. a simple solution like baking soda can cure cancer. i was raised taking a bit of soda and water for indigestion and i'm 61 yrs old. i got a head start on curing cancer in MY lifetime. red clover blossom, pau d arco, goldenseal, are the hardcore medicinal herbs that cures cancer. the doctors know this. the drug companies know this. the fda is trying to make using these herbs for medicinal reasons, illegal. look out! buying vitamin c is gonna b against the law. it's all satan's plan to distract this world from staying focused on the truth. his time is short and he wants to take as many people to hell w/him as he can. i'm no fanatic but I am a believer. I pray for this world to come back to its roots and love the Lord as He loves you. then watch all this evilness and hatefulness and unrighteousness disappear. i'm so tired of seeing signs saying GOD BLESS AMERICA. when it should read AMERICA BLESS GOD! praise God and thank You Jesus!
Reply • Like • 11 hours ago
•
Lori Diversey • Top Commenter • CEO/Owner/Founder at CaveChick, Inc.
Well said Mike Adams!
Reply • 1 • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 5:17am
•
Sarah Swanson • Kirkwood Community College
Why do people care what another person does with their body? Famous or not? Rich or poor? Why is this anyone's business? Even if she puts the story out there and makes it everyone's business, like most celebrities tend to do whether that's their intention or not, why do people make such a big stink about it? There are bigger problems that we need to face. Bigger problems than what one woman decides to do with her boobs.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 6 hours ago
•
Hanny June • Top Commenter
I would suggest that Angelina Jolie has been brainwashed! No woman in her right mind would have their breasts removed unless it was a true danger to their current health. I just can't understand the thinking.....a small chance of breast cancer due to a so called defective gene....there's probably a bigger chance of having a car accident but that doesn't stop anyone driving.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 18 hours ago
•
Gavin Simcoe
I think it's awful that women are treating her like that. Who cares? Regular women also can't afford to adopt a bunch of kids or have really, really nice stuff... But guess what? It's her right. It's her money. It's her health and her body.. Who is anyone to criticize her for that? Just because someone else can't afford the same preventative measures, they think she shouldn't be able to give herself peace of mind? That's terribly ignorant.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 7:25am
•
Tony Gassner • Top Commenter • No 1 School of Technical Training, Royal Air Force Halton England
Hoo boy! Think of all the parts that can be surgically removed to prevent something that might - just might interfere with our lifestyles. Perhaps frontal lobotomies will stop us thinking which may be the cheapest option. Just be careful with the disposal, one may be getting ones own back at a fast food purveyor.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 14 hours ago
•
Shirley Drew
I guess it is her choice, one made easier because she can afford to have her breasts reconstructed, what irks me is she is a very public figure and some women will copy her actions. Personally I would not do it unless it was the last resort. One has to wonder what kind of professional advice she was receiving and why she took it..
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 13 hours ago
•
Sarah J Barendse • Top Commenter • Natural Health Advocate at Doterra Independent Product Consultant
wow really? They are envious that she could have this done?
Do not lop off body parts in the name of "what if" people! wake the heck up!
Clearly its a good thing you don't have the money or you would just use it to mutilate yourselves and give more profit to the crooked medical industry!
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 14 hours ago
•
Marisol Rivera Mendez • Works at Job
If Angelina wants to remove her breast that is her prerogative. People have to do want is best for them. I personally would never remove my healthy breast. I think this New Jersey lady is taking it to far and making it about herself.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 14 hours ago
•
Coco Bean • Top Commenter • Trinity School of Natural Health
Ironically, the thing AFTER the very last thing ever to be on my mind would be Angelina's breasts. I didn't know she had any. The fact that we're discussing it means her advertisement is effective.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 13 hours ago
•
Brigitte Mehr • Owner at SEO In Leeds
I wonder if she really did have the procedure at all - maybe it was just a massive PR stunt. Her diary and photos of her over the last few months do not fit with major surgery at all.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 7 hours ago
•
Julie Reynolds • Follow • Murray High School
I am so glad to have read this news! I just thought 87 per cent chance!!! Chance! How bout no more travel there a chance of cancer from all the radiation...
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 19 hours ago
•
Toqui S. Terchun • Riverhead, New York
Whoa!
Take a read on THIS one !
Reply • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 4:47am
o
Toqui S. Terchun • Riverhead, New York
Whoa!
Take a read on THIS one !
Reply • Like • Yesterday at 4:47am
o
Alyson Mead • Follow
That was one of my first thoughts when I heard this news. Followed by about ten others.
Reply • 1 • Like • Yesterday at 4:48am
o
Colleen S Moore
the more men that have their prostate removed because of their fear of cancer the better. eliminate them from the gene pool as quickly as possible, who needs to pass on that kind of thinking.
Reply • 20 • Like • Yesterday at 4:48am
View 1 more
•
Aaron Barlow • Top Commenter
Hang on.

There seems to be a logical flaw in your theory Natural News. Angelina Jolie IS against gene patenting surely. Jolie - "It has got to be a priority to ensure that more woman can access gene testing and lifesaving, preventative treatment, whatever their means and background, wherever they live." If more companies are able to offer the test, then of course the price will go down, but only an invalidation of the patent law will allow other companies to offer the test.

http://www.walletpop.ca/blog/2013/05/16 ... man-genes/

No doubt she's part of an agenda to get women to mutilate themselves but the way that can happen is if the procedure becomes more widely available and the patenting disallowed.

However..

I guess there is the possibility or even liklihood that myriad retains patenting but drops prices along with a mandatory Obamacare premium to cover it and thus makes more money, gets women to mutilate themselves and taxes the public all at once.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • Edited • Yesterday at 8:49am
•
Linda Ziegler Doran
She is free to make her own decisions, she is a big girl even though I think she took the "less educated" route. If the press would stop trying to sell the double mastectomy as the best choice for all women with the same gene. You will always have the naive star struck groupies that follow the celebrities. Luckily, I am raising my kids to steer clear of the likes of them.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 6 hours ago
•
Sony Nieva
decision making... this is hard... and had to think it a thousand times... it's jolie's... she had the wealth... and of course... let's just face the fact.. cancer or not... or any dreadful illness... jolie had her mind set to it....
Reply • Like • Follow Post • 20 hours ago
•
Little Wing • Top Commenter • University of Maine-Orono
the cows that mooed their way into this article needs to stfu. the test is FREE in many instances. there is no backlash just some haters talking crap about things they know nothing about. boo hoo us poor fat AVERAGE women with no looks, brains, or compassion.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 11:24am
•
Colleen M Griffen
Angelina my be a huge star - and everything she does gets plastered all over - she still has the option to do what ever she pleases to her body, and does not deserve any backlash, just as any other person has the same options to do what they choose with their individual lives - the end.
Reply • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 8:48am
•
Rosanne Alldis • Edmonton, Alberta
You people can't say that If you had the genes and could afford to remove your breast that you wouldn't do so!!!!!!
Reply • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 12:04pm
•
Anouchka Wijnings • Follow • Top Commenter • Student Blogger at Life of Bun
I don't see any problems with it tbh

Reply • Like • Follow Post • Yesterday at 7:48am
Facebook social plugin

Sources for this story include:
http://www.nypost.com/p/news/local/ever ... YE5xhdghLM
Stay informed! FREE subscription to the Health Ranger's email newsletter
Get breaking news alerts on GMOs, fluoride, superfoods, natural cures and more...
Join over four million monthly readers. Email privacy 100% protected. Unsubscribe at any time.

Articles Related to This Article:
• Survey finds moms put trust in blogs for food facts

• Military moms make statement by breastfeeding in uniforms

• Minnesota moms threatened with criminal charges for distributing fresh food from local farms

• Illinois armed police force the installation of a Smart Meter - two young moms arrested protecting their homes

• Study - When pregnant moms eat more nuts, their kids have fewer allergies

• Moms can reduce risk of eczema in their babies by taking probiotics
Related video from NaturalNews.TV

Your NaturalNews.TV video could be here.
Upload your own videos at NaturalNews.TV (FREE)

About the author: Mike Adams is an award-winning journalist and holistic nutritionist with a passion for sharing empowering information to help improve personal and planetary health He has authored more than 1,800 articles and dozens of reports, guides and interviews on natural health topics, and he has published numerous courses on preparedness and survival, including financial preparedness, emergency food supplies, urban survival and tactical self-defense. Adams is a trusted, independent journalist who receives no money or promotional fees whatsoever to write about other companies' products. In 2010, Adams created TV.NaturalNews.com, a natural living video sharing site featuring thousands of user videos on foods, fitness, green living and more. He also launched an online retailer of environmentally-friendly products (BetterLifeGoods.com) and uses a portion of its profits to help fund non-profit endeavors. He's also the founder of a well known HTML email software company whose 'Email Marketing Director' software currently runs the NaturalNews subscription database. Adams volunteers his time to serve as the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center, a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, and regularly pursues cycling, nature photography, Capoeira and Pilates. Known by his callsign, the 'Health Ranger,' Adams posts his missions statements, health statistics and health photos at www.HealthRanger.org

Have comments on this article? Post them here:
37 people have commented on this article.
Related Articles:
• Survey finds moms put trust in blogs for food facts

• Military moms make statement by breastfeeding in uniforms

• Minnesota moms threatened with criminal charges for distributing fresh food from local farms

• Illinois armed police force the installation of a Smart Meter - two young moms arrested protecting their homes

• Study - When pregnant moms eat more nuts, their kids have fewer allergies

• Moms can reduce risk of eczema in their babies by taking probiotics
Take Action: Support NaturalNews.com
Email this article to a friend

Permalink to this article:

Reprinting this article: Non-commercial use OK, cite NaturalNews.com with clickable link.

Embed article link: (copy HTML code below):

Most Popular
Today | Week | Month | Year
• EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)
• U.S. dairy industry petitions FDA to approve aspartame as hidden, unlabeled additive in milk, yogurt, eggnog and cream
• US government claims 100% ownership over all your DNA and reproductive rights; genetic slavery is already here
• Discover the seven most nutrient-dense foods on earth
• Devastating tornado in Oklahoma begs the question: Why don't schools and families build tornado shelters anymore?
• Mango, the new diabetes and cancer buster
• Angelina Jolie backlash grows as everyday moms blast elitist double mastectomy as affordable only by ultra rich
• Angelina Jolie copied by men! Surgeons now cutting out healthy prostate glands of men who carry BRCA gene
• How Angelina Jolie was duped by cancer doctors into self mutilation for breast cancer she never had
• List of dangerous antidepressants that cause sudden death is rapidly expanding
• Six easy ways to sweeten food without using refined sugar or artificial sweeteners
• Eight foods that can make or break your sleep
See all Top Headlines...

GET YOUR FREE GIFT + SHOW DETAILS.

Now Available from NaturalNews.TV
Also on NaturalNews:
• Health Ranger Videos
• Activist music
• CounterThink Cartoons
• Food documentaries
• FREE Special Reports
• Podcasts

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Support NaturalNews Sponsors:

Advertise with NaturalNews...

Most Popular Stories
U.S. dairy industry petitions FDA to approve aspartame as hidden, unlabeled additive in milk, yogurt, eggnog and cream
109K
EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)
98K
Prominent rifle manufacturer killed in mysterious car crash days after posting psych drug link to school shooters
82K
How Angelina Jolie was duped by cancer doctors into self mutilation for breast cancer she never had
77K
Angelina Jolie inspires women to maim themselves by celebrating medically perverted double mastectomies
72K
Facebook bans Gandhi quote as part of revisionist history purge
66K
BREAKING: European Commission to criminalize nearly all seeds and plants not registered with government
58K
Obama betrays America yet again by signing the 'Monsanto Protection Act' into law
52K
Photos: Private military operatives hired to 'work' the Boston marathon with black backpacks, radiation detectors, tactical gear
41K
Boston marathon bombing happened on same day as 'controlled explosion' drill by Boston bomb squad
39K
Dr. Oz viciously attacks organic foods and farmers markets, pushes feedlot beef, urges clueless consumers to eat more pesticides and GMO (opinion)
37K
USDA caves to food industry pressures, approves three new toxic meat preservatives
35K

25 Amazing Facts About Food
This FREE downloadable report unveils a collection of astonishing and little-known facts about the food we eat very day. Click here to read it now...

Resveratrol and its Effects on Human Health and Longevity - Myth or Miracle.
Unlock the secrets of cellular health with the "miracle" nutrient Resveratrol Click here to read it now...

Nutrition Can Save America
FREE online report shows how we can save America through a nutrition health care revolution. "Eating healthy is patriotic!" Click here to read it now...

The Healing Power of Sunlight and Vitamin D
In this exclusive interview, Dr. Michael Holick reveals fascinating facts on how vitamin D is created and used in the human body to ward off chronic diseases like cancer, osteoporosis, mental disorders and more. Click here to read it now...

Vaccines: Get the Full Story
The International Medical Council on Vaccination has released, exclusively through NaturalNews.com, a groundbreaking document containing the signatures of physicians, brain surgeons and professors, all of which have signed on to a document stating that vaccines pose a significant risk of harm to the health of children. Click here to read it now...

Health Ranger Storable Organics
GMO-free, chemical-free foods and superfoods for long-term storage and preparedness. See selection at www.StorableOrganics.com

Recommended Resources On:
Natural News trends
Health Ranger news
Natural News GMOs
Mike Adams tracker
Natural News photos
Natural News Global
Natural News in focus
Natural News connect
Natural News shocking stories
Natural News radar
GMOs
Quackwatch
Vaccines
Health freedom
Dr. Paul Offit

This site is part of the Natural News Network © 2013 All Rights Reserved. Privacy | Terms All content posted on this site is commentary or opinion and is protected under Free Speech. Truth Publishing International, LTD. is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. Truth Publishing assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. Your use of this website indicates your agreement to these terms and those published here. All trademarks, registered trademarks and servicemarks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040417_Angel ... z2TzLQvVvG

FREE PORN VIDEO'S

Angelina Jolie backlash grows as everyday moms blast elitist

Angelina Jolie backlash grows as everyday moms blast elitist

Who is online